|
|
(HealthNewsDigest.com) – Universal coverage. A public insurance option. Mandated coverage. Government fee schedules. Sound like the language of health care reform? “Obama Care?” Think again.
These have long been features of California’s robust workers’ compensation health insurance system, yet few think of that system as “socialist” or a government takeover of health care.
As the debate about health care reform rages, there are lessons to learn from the workers’ compensation insurance system – a system that, by and large, serves both employees and employers well.
Across the nation, workplace injury rates continue to fall as employers focus on safety to reduce insurance premiums. Doctors compete to attract workers’ compensation patients. Insurers have healthy profits even as they compete against public insurers in California and 20 other states.
In California, workers’ compensation insurance premiums are at an eight-year low, and a study earlier this year by the California Workers’ Compensation Institute found, based on the lastest available data, that the medical portion of the average workers’ claim was lower in 2007 than in 2002.
Insurance premium rates are set competitively by the market.Employees who are injured due to work-related incidents are fully covered for the care they need to recover to optimum health. There are also provisions to compensate them for lost work time.
Universal workers’ compensation coverage helps level the competitive playing field. All employers must provide the same level of coverage as their competitors. This eliminates cost shifting from employers without workers’ compensation coverage, so employers who do provide coverage aren’t handicapped.
Because all employers are required to have workers’ compensation coverage, and payments to doctors and therapists are typically controlled by fee schedules, employers try to lower costs by improving safety records, shopping for better premium rates and sending employees to more effective doctors and networks – not simply by cutting benefits or squeezing doctors’ incomes.
As we try to reform health care, we need reform that encourages this kind of healthy competition.
When employers and insurers are responsible for “total case costs” – medical care, lost wages and lost ability – they don’t scrimp on care or want to let it drag on.
They want injured or ill employees to have appropriate comprehensive medical treatment as soon as possible so they can get back to work. Otherwise, the employer will have to pay someone else to do the job, pay lost wages for the injured employee and suffer higher premiums in future years.
The lesson for health care reform is that care that is appropriate, readily accessible and comprehensive can be less expensive in the long run than care that is dribbled out over a longer period of time. Also, the experience of workers’ compensation shows that care need not be inaccessible in a regulated system with government fee schedules, universal coverage and mandates.
Quality need not suffer either. Some states, including California, have adopted practice guidelines developed by the American College of Environmental and Occupational Medicine for doctors to use when treating injured workers. Use of such guidelines results in more consistent, high-quality care with better outcomes for workers, while helping to contain costs.
A public insurance option can work. Twenty-one states have them. The California State Compensation Insurance Fund, or SCIF, for example, has competed in the marketplace since 1914 and serves as the insurer of last resort. It has historically maintained a market share of around 23 percent, and there continues to be a vigorous private insurance market.
The political process works – eventually.
California’s workers’ compensation system got out of control in the late 1990s as benefits and legal costs soared. Ultimately, private insurance companies began to leave the market, businesses pleaded for relief, with some closing their doors and others threatening to leave. All that prompted a series of legislative and administrative reforms that resulted in dramatic improvements.
In the end, the reforms affected workers, lawyers, health care providers, insurers and employers – everyone touched by the system. No one got everything they wanted, but the reforms worked and the system was saved.
Today, with all of California’s woes, its workers’ compensation system is not one of them.
As the country debates health care reform, let’s not overlook the lessons of a sound system of universal coverage that’s already here and working well.
Daniel D. Crowley is chief executive of U.S. HealthWorks (www.ushealthworks.com), the second-largest operator of occupational health clinics, which is based in Valencia.
Daniel D. Crowley is Chairman, President and CEO of U.S. HealthWorks.
Mr. Crowley is also the principal of Dynamic Healthcare Solutions, a firm that invests in and consults with healthcare firms. Through Dynamic, he has served as a senior advisor to a number of major investment firms, served on boards of certain portfolio companies, performed due diligence on numerous investment opportunities and served as a healthcare restructuring officer, senior management advisor and interim executive of a variety of healthcare services companies.
Subscribe to our FREE Ezine and be eligible for Health News, discounted products/services and coupons related to your Health. We publish 24/7.
HealthNewsDigest.com
We videotape Press Conferences, produce SMT’s, VNR’s, B-rolls, PSA’s, – all with distribution: HealthyTelevisionProductions