|
|
(HealthNewsDigest.com) – University Park, Pa. — College students looking at photographs spent more time gazing at the people in the pictures than the surrounding elements,
even when those people were quite small or not centrally located,
according to Penn State researchers. These findings could help the researchers develop better visual-scene displays (VSDs) —
computer-generated images that help people with disabilities learn to communicate.
According to Krista Wilkinson, professor of communication sciences and
disorders and the study’s lead author, traditional communication displays
show a grid of abstract images to the viewer. Individuals — often
children with intellectual and developmental disabilities, such as Down
syndrome or autism spectrum disorders — are encouraged to communicate
their ideas by pointing to one or more of the images in the grid.
“But,” said Wilkinson, “this approach isn’t effective because children
don’t learn their early words in isolation.”
“Instead,” added Janice Light, Distinguished Professor of Communication
Sciences and Disorders and the other author of the paper that appeared in
a recent issue of the Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research,
“people formulate ideas in the context of the events and the people in
their lives.”
They explain that a child might learn the word “dog” from hearing it in a
variety of experiential contexts. Thus, children learn about and hear the
label for dogs as they see dogs in the park, pat them at their relatives’
houses and get kisses from them.
“These predictable routines,” said Light, “may be critical in
facilitating language development because they provide contextual support
for the acquisition of new concepts and words.”
It seems reasonable to consider that VSDs featuring events, like a child
receiving a kiss from a dog while mom looks on, might be effective in
aiding people with disabilities learn to communicate.
Wilkinson and Light recruited 19 college students to observe eight
photographs in which a human figure appeared near one or more items that
might be expected to compete for visual attention, such as a Christmas
tree or a table loaded with food. They used eye-tracking technology to
obtain precise recordings of the participants’ gazes.
The team used college students rather than children with disabilities
because they wanted to obtain a baseline dataset, to see if their
expectations might apply to individuals with fully developed language and
fully developed cognitive, visual and attentional processing.
“So little is known about the allocation of visual attention to humans in
photographs for any population,” said Wilkinson. “We felt it was necessary
to begin by mapping out basic patterns of visual attention in nondisabled
participants as a precursor to considering the potential impact of
development and disability on these patterns.”
The researchers’ primary criterion for selecting the photographs was that
the main human figure or figures did not occupy a substantial proportion
of the photographic space, but occupied between 1.3 percent and 18.3
percent of the space. In most photographs, the humans were far smaller
than many other elements. A second criterion was that the photographs
contain at least one other element that, based on subjective judgment,
might compete for visual attention. For instance, one of the photographs
showed a child sitting near a fully decorated holiday tree, with a dog and
a cat lying on the floor nearby.
Wilkinson and Light then presented the photos to the students in a
slideshow display on a computer monitor. Each of the photos was displayed
for approximately seven seconds with a three-second interval in between.
During the slideshow, the team recorded the students’ exact gazing points
using a sophisticated eye-tracking system.
They found that the participants fixated on the humans within the
photographs more rapidly and for longer than expected based on their size,
regardless of the other elements in the scene.
“The human figure in each photograph attracted attention from a majority
of the participants,” said Wilkinson, who added that the other types of
elements that attracted attention from a majority of viewers were the
animate figures that were not the subjects of the photograph, such as
animals and bystanders.
“Our study suggests that humans may be key elements that capture and
maintain visual attention, even in scenes with many other potential
competitors,” said Wilkinson. “Research has shown that babies prefer to
look at human faces over other stimuli. Our study underscores the powerful
draw of human figures on visual attention across different and distinct
contexts, even in adults and even in the presence of attractive and
interesting distracters.”
In their next study, Wilkinson and Light plan to use the same photos to
examine how children respond to the presence of humans in images.
***
Subscribe to our FREE Ezine and receive current Health News, be eligible for discounted products/services and coupons related to your Health. We publish 24/7.
www.HealthNewsDigest.com
For advertising/promotion, email: [email protected] Or call toll free: 877- 634-9180